• AVR Freaks

Helpful ReplyHot!Suggestions for the next release of MPLAB® Code Configurator

Page: << < ..111213 Showing page 13 of 13
Author
Gouthami c v
Starting Member
  • Total Posts : 79
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2019/07/11 01:55:44
  • Location: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:Suggestions for the next release of MPLAB® Code Configurator 2019/07/18 23:21:31 (permalink)
0
Hi, i am using PIC24F04KA200 for this series MCC is notworking in MPLAB IDE. Can any one help for this.
 
 
 
Thanking you.
mcovington
New Member
  • Total Posts : 18
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2019/07/12 09:19:40
  • Location: 0
  • Status: offline
Re:Suggestions for the next release of MPLAB® Code Configurator 2019/07/19 20:04:13 (permalink)
0
Maybe an option to generate fewer files and put more into the main .c file?  For smaller projects it would be convenient to end up with a single .c file (like the programs in textbooks and documentation).
 
oliverb
Super Member
  • Total Posts : 209
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2009/02/16 13:12:38
  • Location: 0
  • Status: offline
Re: Suggestions for the next release of MPLAB® Code Configurator 2019/07/22 05:25:27 (permalink)
5 (1)
One request: currently I believe it is very difficult to migrate a MCC design to a different PIC. My specific issue was that if the project was for a 28 pin variant and I switched to a 44 pin variant the only way to get pin manager to accept the existance of ports D and E was to delete and rebuild the MCC configuration.
 
Please make it easier to change PIC.
 
Diesel888
New Member
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Reward points : 0
  • Joined: 2019/07/25 19:35:04
  • Location: 0
  • Status: offline
Re: Suggestions for the next release of MPLAB® Code Configurator 2019/07/31 17:13:07 (permalink)
0
Could the team consider adding PIC 18F8722 to MCC support, please.
This MC fits my purpose (and I'm part way through my project), and the 18F87K22 iteration is already supported, so perhaps it would not be too onerous a task for the team.
Dennis in Tasmania
 
*seems to be an issue with ADC though, but it looks like an offset I can measure then allow for (part of the reason I'd like to see MCC generated code for ADC).
 
Page: << < ..111213 Showing page 13 of 13
Jump to:
© 2019 APG vNext Commercial Version 4.5