Re: Production In Circuit progamer for PIC24FJ256GA705
I don't have PICkit4, but I did a long investigation of programming speed with PICkit3 and ICD3.
From what other people posted, it appears that PICkit4 and ICD4 are faster than PICkit3 and ICD3 because they skip unused space when programming. When the chip is full, or nearly full, it is about the same speed.
Snap is said to be faster, but nobody posted any real measurements yet. I don't have that one neither.
At any rate, NSDSP would be faster than any of these. It takes 5.5s to fully program and verify PIC24FJ256GA705.